Which 'could possibly NEVER happen pairing?'
#101
Posted 28 August 2007 - 07:45 PM
#102
Posted 28 August 2007 - 08:18 PM
It's kinda.... maybe, cute. But I'm still not sure about J/L
#103
Posted 28 August 2007 - 08:22 PM
i'am not much of a S/L,and J/C
#104
Posted 28 August 2007 - 08:32 PM
Basically it's to inforce more confusion than you would in WTF.What's ftw mean
But it could also mean For The Win, as ssj4majuub said.
.:!Gwen!:.
#105
Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:44 AM
u really should!!! is a supa cool pairing! :thumbsup:Ack, I'm actually starting to consider Sheen/Cindy... D:
It's kinda.... maybe, cute. But I'm still not sure about J/L
o:) Andre o:)
#106
Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:48 AM
...maybe Cindy/Timmy...probably Cindy/Timmy...
But I just can't see Cindy/Sheen. Ever. D;
.:!Gwen!:.
#107
Posted 01 September 2007 - 10:14 PM
#108
Posted 04 December 2007 - 06:14 PM
Also know Judy/Carl is so not happing. The women is married for corn sakes, Carl is scarry.
#109
Posted 04 December 2007 - 06:50 PM
why not!! give it a chance! come on! the'd look cute together!!! u should try! really! they rock!But I just can't see Cindy/Sheen. Ever. D;
.:!Gwen!:.
o:) Andre o:)
#110
Posted 05 December 2007 - 02:10 AM
It's so WRONG. LOL.
~Rach~
#111
Posted 05 December 2007 - 02:34 AM
#112
Posted 05 December 2007 - 02:42 AM
~Rach~
#113
Posted 05 December 2007 - 04:04 AM
(Erm, for those of you who go on nick.com and like my terrible writing)
~*(+Justine+)*~
#114
Posted 05 December 2007 - 04:10 AM
Elkie x Butch of couse! ICK! I am getting sick just thinking about it!
#115
Posted 05 December 2007 - 06:44 PM
lol :lol:Yes, yes the Carl/Judy one is freaky scarry. I hope Carl some day realizes that mom's just don't work for romancesXD
o:) Andre o:)
#116
Posted 12 August 2009 - 04:42 AM
#117
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:33 PM
#118
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:48 PM
#119
Posted 12 August 2009 - 09:12 PM
I agree with Katy that you should add a Bolbi/Cindy option...
#120
Posted 13 August 2009 - 02:55 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










