
The Killer in Me stars a 17-year-old girl named Nina who enters the mind of a serial killer whenever she falls asleep at night. From sundown to sunup, she experiences everything that he experiences - every gruesome, evil, twisted, thrilling moment of it. Naturally, this has some pretty devastating effects on her psyche. She starts abusing stimulants to keep herself awake. She withdraws from her friends and her adopted mother. She becomes obsessed with finding and stopping the killer. Eventually, she decides to drive to New Mexico and confront him on his home turf...but when she gets there, the man she meets is not the obvious psychopath she was expecting. After discovering the true nature of her connection to him, Nina begins to question whether he is really a murderer at all. Is he playing mind games with her? Can he see through her eyes while he sleeps, the way she can see through his? Or is the whole thing - the whole tangled, disturbing mess - all in her head?
This book was....hmm. There were a lot of things I liked about it. Nina was a realistically tortured protagonist. Her friend/eventual love interest Warren was quite likable. The killer's real identity was predictable, but it made sense I guess...and I enjoyed the way the narrative made you, the reader, question Nina's sanity at times. I think one of the main problems with the book was the setting. The first half takes place in Montpelier, Vermont, and the author gets stuff wrong about the culture here. She takes old-fashioned slang terms from the Northeast Kingdom and plops them into the mouths of current-day teenagers living in the goddamn capital. Like, nobody outside the booniest of the boonies calls rednecks "woodchucks" anymore. People in Montpelier don't judge and/or pity children growing up in single parent households. I mean, it's friggin Montpelier. What is this, the 1950s? And sure, we have open carry laws and a bunch of gun nuts, but high schoolers don't tell other high schoolers to go to a gun shop to buy a firearm. They get one from a relative, or a friend, or the internet, or a newspaper ad. Long story short, seeing my home state portrayed inaccurately lowered the rating for me. I'm not sure it would be a problem for other readers.
Rating: ![]()
![]()
3 stars
















